Which Low Resource Linux Distribution Should You Use For Your Old Computer?
If you have an old machine that no longer has an operating system, you don’t have to throw that machine away. You can put it to good use with an operating system that doesn’t require a fast processor or big disk drive. Fortunately there are plenty of Linux distributions that will work on your old hardware and run at fairly moderate speeds even if your machine is really old. There are quite a few Linux distributions that don’t demand too much resources so that your computer will run relatively fast.
First of all, you need to stay away from distributions that use Gnome and KDE. These tend to use too many resources for old hardware and will cause the machine to lag way too much for basic applications. Look for these distributions that don’t use these graphical interfaces.
These low resource distributions are all based on Ubuntu meaning that you have access to all the debian packages that Canonical supports giving you access to tons of software.
Xubuntu is a quality distribution that doesn’t use too much power. It’s uses XFCE which will help with slower computers. This one does work well but might not be best for very, very old machines as XFCE is a bit more demanding than some other low power interfaces. This will be a bit easier because it’s basic interface works a lot like Windows which most people will be used to.
Linux Mint 6 Fluxbox Community Edition is a very high quality low resource distribution. This uses Fluxbox which will work better with computers that can’t run Xubuntu too well. This distribution has all your basic essentials. It’s layout will take a little while to get used to. Instead of a start button, you have to right click on the desktop to open your applications.
MoonOS LXDE is another good one to try. This uses LXDE which hardly uses any ram to actively run. Typically you can download LXDE but MoonOS has it all set up for you already after installing so that nothing has to be set up.
By following these tips you may be able to put an old machine to good use.
Herb likes to get the most possible use out of the technology he has on hand. Please check out his website with information on kids toy storage and details on childrens toy boxes.
Learn what you really needs to pass real test with testking 642-982 dumps. We provide up to date testking 646-985 study guide and testking HP0-S25 to help you pass real exam in first attempt.
Related posts:





10 Comments to 'Which Low Resource Linux Distribution Should You Use For Your Old Computer?'
May 27, 2010
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008070208 Firefox/3.0.1 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)
For all those people using old G3 and G4 PowerPC Apple machines, I recommend Linux Mint LXDE PPC. For info have a look here: http://mac.linux.be/content/linux-mint-lxde-debian-50-ppc-fact
May 27, 2010
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; es-ES; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100501 Iceweasel/3.5.9 (like Firefox/3.5.9)
I have not doubt answering your question: Debian.
I have some old PCs (mostly AMD K6-2) and run Debian plus some light desktop enviroment smoothly.
May 27, 2010
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.3) Gecko/20100401 Firefox/3.0.1, Ant.com
Try puppy linux with hard drive installation or Lubuntu (Ubuntu using LXDE).
May 27, 2010
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.3) Gecko/20100416 Mandriva Linux/1.9.2.3-0.2mdv2010.0 (2010.0) Firefox/3.6.3
You could have come up with a longer list. Mandriva MUD lxde edition, Lubuntu, Crunchbang… they’re all there on Distrowatch.
May 27, 2010
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.3) Gecko/20100401 Firefox/3.6.3 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)
Fair enough, Techradar had a great article about their top 8 tiny distros: http://techradar.com/683552 — I am a huge fan of Crunchbang, I use 8.10 quite a lot on old machines!
May 28, 2010
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; ca; rv:1.9.2.3) Gecko/20100423 Ubuntu/10.04 (lucid) Firefox/3.6.3
Don’t think nowadays Xubuntu can be still considered a “lightweight” distribution at all. It uses almost the same, and sometimes more, resources than Gnome.
May 28, 2010
SOAP::Lite/Perl/0.710.08
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Dr. Roy Schestowitz, larusalka. larusalka said: ? @schestowitz: Old Computers Have Many GNU/Linux Options http://ur1.ca/044o0 #FOSS [...]
May 28, 2010
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.3) Gecko/20100401 Firefox/3.6.3
I’d recommend Puppy Linux, but with the warning that in practice its forum is its repository. Sometimes it throws people off, but I certainly don’t mind.
If you want a real repository, I’d go for Lubuntu. It’s loads lighter than Xubuntu, if my experience is indicative.
June 21, 2010
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US) AppleWebKit/533.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/5.0.375.70 Safari/533.4
I tried both the final release of Lubuntu, and the release candidate 1 of Linux Mint LXDE 9 release (codename: Isadora) on my old computer with the following specs – Intel Celeron 2.40ghz, L2 cache 256KB, 256mb RAM, 40gb hard disk.
Lubuntu: fast response, BUT it couldn’t automatically detect my Huawei broadband USB modem.
Linux Mint LXDE: installer froze at mid-install.
So I reverted back to Linux Mint LXDE 8 :(
You would think that the higher version you go, the easier hardware detection. But I guess that’s not the way it is for Linux Land.
February 11, 2011
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E; InfoPath.1)
Crunchbang and AntiX both worked on one of my machines when practically nothing else (including Linux Mint) would. Also, FreeBSD runs even faster and makes better use of resources on my old laptop than Linux does.
Leave a comment