Linux Distro and Desktop – The More the Merrier, Right?
By Ashok Ramachandran
Isn’t it great that the open source world gives you a lot of choices? When it comes to Linux distributions, shortly known
as distros, there are hundreds of them. Once you have selected a distro, you are up against a decision regarding the desktop. You need to know enough about the pros and cons of these choices so that you can pick the one that is right for you.
Let us briefly revisit the requirements for a successful migration.
You have to meet three requirements before installing Linux on your home PC:
- You have identified a demonstrable benefit you can gain by migrating to Linux
- You have done your prep work
- You have realistic expectations
By following these three steps, you will maximize your chances of success.
However, there is a mind boggling variety of Linux distros available.
Let us try and shortlist the Linux distros based on the following five criteria:
- Is it backed by a commercial vendor?
- Is desktop Linux for home a stated focus area for this vendor?
- Is a retail product available in the form of a CD/DVD?
- Are branded PC vendors shipping this distro pre-installed?
- Is paid support available, if needed?
We find that there are only two Linux distros that meet these five qualifications largely – Ubuntu and SUSE Linux.

Ubuntu
- Sponsored by Canonical.
- You can download it free, buy it on DVD from Amazon or get a free CD shipped (takes 6 to 10 weeks).
- Starter support for Ubuntu Desktop Edition is available for one year at $ 54.99 (as of Sept 2009).
- Security update is available for 18 months from release.
SUSE
- Sponsored by Novell.
- You can download it free, buy it on DVD from Amazon.
- You can buy a package from Novell consisting of a DVD with printed manual and 90-Day installation support (by phone or e-mail) for $59.95 (as of Sept 2009).
- Security update is available for 2 years from release.
Can I buy Linux pre-installed from a branded PC vendor? Dell offers PCs for the home and home office market pre-installed with Ubuntu Linux. HP and MSI offer PCs with Novell SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop pre-installed. Asus offers notebooks with Xandros Linux pre-installed. Acer offers notebooks with Linpus Linux.
Can I get Linux pre-installed from another vendor? Zareason, Berkley, CA and System76, Denver, CO sell Ubuntu Linux desktops and laptops.
Which desktop? Though there are other options available, we will restrict our selection to the two leading desktops, namely GNOME and KDE.
![]()
GNOME
- GNOME is a very mature and stable desktop.
- The GNOME project has well defined human interface guidelines to make the desktop and applications easy to use. Most GNOME applications follow these guidelines, resulting in common usability between applications.
- GNOME doesn’t provide a graphical interface for some of the settings. Users will have to use the command line interface for these.
KDE
- KDE is also a very mature desktop. However, KDE 4 was completely rewritten and so had some issues. The recent 4.3 version seems to be more stable.
- KDE is also better for new users switching from Windows, and relies less on the command line interface.
- Unfortunately, KDE does not use Firefox as the default web browser or OpenOffice as the default office suite. You will have to install Firefox and OpenOffice subsequently.
If you are planning to use an older machine and just require stability and an uncluttered approach then you can go with GNOME. However, if you have a newer machine, looking for a desktop closer to Windows and avoid the command line interface, then KDE is your best bet.
Ashok shows home PC users how to successfully migrate to Linux. He writes articles applying Product Management concepts to open source software and related topics.
Related posts:






4 Comments to 'Linux Distro and Desktop – The More the Merrier, Right?'
October 11, 2009
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.0.14) Gecko/2009091914 Mandriva/1.9.0.14-0.1mdv2009.1 (2009.1) Firefox/3.0.14
What a dumb set of criteria…
First of all, Ubuntu did not start out having a commercial backer. That came later. Second, why does this matter? Debian is the real powerhouse behind Ubuntu, and it has been around for longer than anyone than probably Slackware, and it’ setup to be perpetually developed. So why would it matter that there isn’t a commercial backer for it?
Smaller community distros derived from more mainstream ones often improve upon them in very significant ways. PCLinuxOS, for instance, derives from Mandriva, but it’s miles better. Linux Mint improves upon Ubuntu drastically. The UI is actually useful, and the included non-free software sets up your computer from the word “go” with full abilities to play music and watch flash and other non-free stuff.
Just about every distro out there is available on CD from OnDisc.com. So, this point is moot.
If you need paid support to get Linux up and running, you’ve either got major hardware issues that probably won’t be solved without an upgrade of some kind, or you’ve money to throw away. Most distros have thriving communities that are perfectly willing to help, and wikis to look up information. Truly easy to use distros such as Mandriva have GUI control panel applications that make administration and setup a snap.
Rolling release distros such as PCLinuxOS, Arch, Debian, have not only security updates, but completely up to date software for a very long time. The last time you actually had to do a fresh install of PCLinuxOS was March of 2007. Talk about long term support… Ubuntu and Suse both have to be completely updated, requiring either risky ‘dist-upgrade’ method, or the much preferred wipe and reinstall method with every new release (6 – 8 months).
Why would it matter if major PC vendors are preinstalling any flavor of Linux? Why would that make you want to put it on your machine? Xandros and Linpus were both preinstalled on netbooks and horrendously slow and easily outdated. Ubuntu from Dell has been heavily criticised because of update problems. So, then why is this even a concern?
The best criteria for installin Linux on your machine is:
1.) Will it install on your hardware? A check in the forums will give you an idea.
2.) Is the community thriving and civilized? Is there enough participation in the community so that your questions will be answered and your problems solved?
3.) How easy is the distro to use? Obviously, Slackware is NOT for the beginner. Distros like PCLinuxOS, Mandriva, and (to a lesser degree) OpenSuse make it almost too easy. Distros like Ubuntu are also easy, but be prepared to open a console now and then. KDE will feel more right at home to Windows users, but Gnome is good if you’re willing to learn something new.
4.) Do you constantly want the latest/greatest and are willing to sacrifice the reality of the problems that may pop up with it, or would you rather take a slower path and have a solid system? Distros like Fedora are bleeding edge, but be prepared to have problems at times. PCLinuxOS is rolling release and has a reputation for being rock solid because they don’t release on a specified schedule, but they’re still at kernel 2.6.26 with something slightly newer in testing, but latest isn’t even on the horizon, yet. Most packages are very up-to-date, though. It’s a tradeoff.
5.) Can you take it for a spin on a LiveCD/DVD? It’s nice to try before you commit. You can learn if the distro can even boot on your machine at all.
BTW, Mandriva also meets all of your requirements. They are a bit lesser used than either Ubuntu or OpenSuse, these days, but they are installed by OEMs around the world (maybe not in the US), commercially backed, have long been oriented toward the desktop user (actually probably the original desktop oriented distro), and they offer paid packaged products with manuals and complete paid support. It’s also easier to use than either OpenSuse or Ubunutu.
October 11, 2009
Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/4.3; Linux) KHTML/4.3.1 (like Gecko)
“Unfortunately, KDE does not use Firefox as the default web browser or OpenOffice as the default office suite. You will have to install Firefox and OpenOffice subsequently.”
What does Firefox or OpenOffice have to do specifically with gnome that makes it some how connected? They are independent projects from KDE or Gnome and depending on your distro they may or may not be installed
October 22, 2009
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1)
A parent w 4 kids, one special needs baby, and unwed teen w an infant should probably have her hands full with her brood. ,
October 23, 2009
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1)
Constitutionally, only the American Government has the authority to issue currency. ,
Leave a comment